response-gen@v1

active

Simulates a profile's behavioral response to a scenario.

Methodology page for entity type profile_scenario_response, referenced by the provenance.methodology field of paid API responses.

Generation model

Provideropenrouter

Modelanthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet

Temperature0.7

Prompt integrity

The prompt template itself is proprietary; its SHA-256 hash below lets you verify that the template_hashrecorded in any record's provenance chain matches this published methodology version.

template_hash (sha256): 6082183b01d2bb60932288acde5aa36a848ecac471e786d9dda1c03805ee08f8

Validation pipeline

Every generated item passes this hook chain, in order, before it can reach a human curator:

1. schema_validate2. provenance_stamp3. route

Output schema

Records are guaranteed to satisfy this JSON Schema (invalid items are rejected, never repaired):

{
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "items"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "items": {
      "type": "array",
      "items": {
        "type": "object",
        "required": [
          "response",
          "reasoning_chain",
          "emotional_arc",
          "confidence"
        ],
        "properties": {
          "response": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "confidence": {
            "type": "number",
            "maximum": 1,
            "minimum": 0
          },
          "emotional_arc": {
            "type": "string"
          },
          "reasoning_chain": {
            "type": "string"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Generation parameters

{
  "type": "object",
  "required": [
    "profile_id",
    "scenario_id"
  ],
  "properties": {
    "profile_id": {
      "type": "string"
    },
    "scenario_id": {
      "type": "string"
    }
  }
}

Cognitive bias taxonomy

Bias links attached to profiles draw exclusively from this literature-sourced set:

Action BiasPatt & Zeckhauser (2000)

Airdrop EntitlementCrypto-native market observation

Ambiguity AversionEllsberg (1961)

AnchoringTversky & Kahneman (1974)

Insufficient AdjustmentEpley & Gilovich (2006)

ATH AnchoringTversky & Kahneman (1974)

Authority BiasMilgram (1963)

Availability HeuristicTversky & Kahneman (1973)

Backfire EffectNyhan & Reifler (2010)

Bandwagon EffectSocial psychology literature

Base-Rate NeglectKahneman & Tversky (1973)

Belief PerseveranceRoss et al. (1975)

Bias Blind SpotPronin et al. (2002)

Choice-Supportive BiasMather et al. (2000)

Clustering IllusionGilovich (1991)

Narrative BiasTaleb (2007)

Confirmation BiasWason (1960)

Conjunction FallacyTversky & Kahneman (1983)

Contrast EffectBehavioral literature

Curse of KnowledgeCamerer et al. (1989)

Decoy EffectHuber et al. (1982)

Default EffectJohnson & Goldstein (2003)

Denomination EffectRaghubir & Srivastava (2009)

Diamond-Hands Identity BiasMeme-culture market observation

Disposition EffectShefrin & Statman (1985)

Distinction BiasHsee & Zhang (2004)

Dunning–Kruger EffectKruger & Dunning (1999)

Empathy GapLoewenstein (1996)

Endowment EffectThaler (1980)

Escalation of CommitmentStaw (1976)

False-Consensus EffectRoss et al. (1977)

Focusing IllusionSchkade & Kahneman (1998)

Fear of Missing OutSocial psychology literature

Framing EffectTversky & Kahneman (1981)

Fundamental Attribution ErrorRoss (1977)

Gambler’s FallacyLaplace (1796)

Gas Sunk-Cost FallacyArkes & Blumer (1985)

Salience BiasAttention literature

Halo EffectThorndike (1920)

Hard–Easy EffectLichtenstein & Fischhoff (1977)

Herd BehaviorBanerjee (1992)

Hindsight BiasFischhoff (1975)

Hot-Hand FallacyGilovich et al. (1985)

Hyperbolic DiscountingAinslie (1975)

Illusion of ControlLanger (1975)

Illusion of TransparencyGilovich et al. (1998)

Illusory SuperioritySocial psychology literature

Impact BiasWilson & Gilbert (2003)

In-Group BiasTajfel (1970)

Information BiasBaron et al. (1988)

Just-World HypothesisLerner (1980)

Less-Is-Better EffectHsee (1998)

Loss AversionKahneman & Tversky (1979)

Mental AccountingThaler (1985)

Money IllusionFisher (1928)

Negativity BiasRozin & Royzman (2001)

Normalcy BiasDisaster psychology literature

Omission BiasSpranca et al. (1991)

Optimism BiasWeinstein (1980)

Ostrich EffectKarlsson et al. (2009)

Outcome BiasBaron & Hershey (1988)

OverconfidenceFischhoff et al. (1977)

Peak–End RuleKahneman et al. (1993)

Pessimism BiasBehavioral literature

Planning FallacyKahneman & Tversky (1979)

Present BiasO’Donoghue & Rabin (1999)

Pro-Innovation BiasRogers (1962)

Projection BiasLoewenstein et al. (2003)

Pseudocertainty EffectTversky & Kahneman (1981)

ReactanceBrehm (1966)

Recency BiasBehavioral finance literature

RepresentativenessKahneman & Tversky (1972)

Restraint BiasNordgren et al. (2009)

Rosy RetrospectionMitchell et al. (1997)

Rug-Trauma OvercorrectionPost-exploit behavioral observation

Self-Serving BiasMiller & Ross (1975)

Semmelweis ReflexHistory of science

Spotlight EffectGilovich et al. (2000)

Status-Quo BiasSamuelson & Zeckhauser (1988)

Sunk-Cost FallacyArkes & Blumer (1985)

Survivorship BiasWald (1943)

Unit BiasGeier et al. (2006)

Zero-Risk BiasBaron et al. (1993)